The prospect of a criminal trial can be overwhelming and daunting for anyone facing charges in New York. Understanding what to expect throughout this intricate legal process can help alleviate some of the anxiety and prepare you for the various stages of your trial. In New York, criminal trials are rigorous, meticulously structured proceedings that follow a specific sequence, ensuring that justice is served in a fair and impartial manner.
This guide will walk you through the steps of a criminal trial in New York, providing insights into each phase — from the pre-trial motions to the final verdict and potential sentencing.
Arthur Pressman focuses in the areas of DWI, traffic law and criminal defense.
Pre-Trial Motions and Hearings
Before the trial officially begins, there are several pre-trial motions and hearings that take place. These proceedings are crucial in shaping the framework of the trial. During this stage, both the prosecution and the defense have the opportunity to file motions that can significantly impact the course of the trial. Common pre-trial motions include motions to dismiss the case, motions to suppress evidence, and motions to change the venue of the trial. These motions are presented to the judge, who will make rulings that could either streamline or complicate the trial process.
The pre-trial phase is also when plea bargains may be discussed. A plea bargain is an agreement between the prosecution and the defense in which the defendant agrees to plead guilty to a lesser charge in exchange for a reduced sentence or the dismissal of certain charges. While not all cases end in plea bargains, they are a common resolution in the criminal justice system and can be a strategic choice for both sides.
Jury Selection
If the case proceeds to trial, the next significant step is jury selection, also known as voir dire. This process involves selecting impartial jurors who will listen to the evidence, deliberate, and ultimately decide the defendant’s guilt or innocence. Both the prosecution and defense attorneys play a role in questioning potential jurors to ensure they do not hold any biases or preconceived notions that could affect their judgment. The goal is to assemble a fair and balanced jury that can objectively evaluate the evidence presented during the trial.
During jury selection, attorneys may use peremptory challenges and challenges for cause to exclude certain jurors. A peremptory challenge allows an attorney to dismiss a potential juror without providing a reason, although these challenges are limited in number. A challenge for cause, on the other hand, requires the attorney to provide a specific reason why a juror should be dismissed, such as a demonstrated bias or conflict of interest.
Arthur Pressman is who you want representing you in court. My son was pulled over and charged with 3 felonies and several misdemeanors. It was a terrible time, with my son arrested and taken to the holding center. I contacted Mr. Pressmant, and it wasn’t long before the felonies were dropped as were some of the misdemeanors. My son is now getting the help he needs. Mr. Pressman is highly respected in the court system. I am very thankful for what he was able to do. We felt like we were living a nightmare but things turned around and got better because of him. He is very professional but also a genuine nice person . I highly recommend him. J.N.O.
Opening Statements
Once the jury is selected, the trial officially begins with opening statements from both the prosecution and the defense. Opening statements provide an overview of the case and outline the evidence that each side plans to present. The prosecution goes first, followed by the defense. These statements are not considered evidence but rather a roadmap to help the jury understand the context and direction of the trial. Effective opening statements can set the tone for the entire trial, as they offer a glimpse into the key arguments and themes that each side will emphasize.
Presentation of Evidence
The heart of the trial is the presentation of evidence. This phase involves the prosecution and defense calling witnesses, presenting physical evidence, and introducing documents or other materials relevant to the case. The prosecution bears the burden of proof and must establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, the prosecution presents its case first, calling witnesses to testify and introducing evidence to support its claims.
Witness testimony is a critical component of the evidence presentation. Witnesses may include victims, eyewitnesses, law enforcement officers, forensic specialists, and others with pertinent information. Each witness undergoes direct examination by the party that called them and cross-examination by the opposing party. Cross-examination allows the defense to challenge the credibility of the prosecution’s witnesses and highlight any inconsistencies or weaknesses in their testimony.
After the prosecution rests its case, the defense has the opportunity to present its own evidence and witnesses. The defense aims to create reasonable doubt about the defendant’s guilt by presenting alternative explanations, challenging the prosecution’s evidence, and offering testimony that supports the defendant’s innocence. Similar to the prosecution, the defense conducts direct examinations and the prosecution may cross-examine defense witnesses.
Criminal Mischief in the First Degree Felonies versus MisdemeanorsRelated Videos
Closing Arguments
Following the presentation of evidence, both sides deliver closing arguments. Closing arguments summarize the key points of the case and aim to persuade the jury to reach a verdict in favor of the respective party. The prosecution presents its closing argument first, followed by the defense. The prosecution may also offer a rebuttal to address any points raised by the defense in its closing argument.
Closing arguments are the attorneys’ final opportunity to address the jury and reinforce the strengths of their case while highlighting the weaknesses of the opposing side. These arguments often appeal to the jurors’ emotions and logic, urging them to carefully consider the evidence and render a just verdict.
Case Results
Jury Deliberation and Verdict
After closing arguments, the jury is given instructions by the judge. These instructions explain the legal standards that must be met to reach a verdict and outline the specific charges against the defendant. The jury then retires to the deliberation room to discuss the case and reach a decision. Jury deliberations are conducted in private and can last for hours, days, or even longer, depending on the complexity of the case and the evidence presented.
During deliberations, jurors must carefully review the evidence and testimony, consider the arguments made by both sides, and apply the law as instructed by the judge. The jury’s goal is to reach a unanimous verdict. If the jury cannot reach a unanimous decision, the judge may declare a mistrial, and the case may be retried with a new jury.
Once the jury reaches a verdict, they return to the courtroom to announce their decision. If the defendant is found not guilty, they are acquitted of the charges and released. If the defendant is found guilty, the trial moves to the sentencing phase.
Sentencing
In the event of a guilty verdict, the judge will determine the appropriate sentence for the defendant. Sentencing may take place immediately after the verdict or at a separate hearing. During the sentencing phase, the judge considers various factors, including the severity of the offense, the defendant’s criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances.
Both the prosecution and defense may present arguments and evidence related to sentencing. The prosecution may advocate for a harsher penalty, while the defense may argue for leniency. In some cases, victim impact statements may be presented to provide the court with insight into the impact of the crime on the victims and their families.
The judge has discretion in determining the sentence within the framework of New York’s sentencing guidelines. Sentences may include fines, probation, community service, imprisonment, or a combination of these penalties. The judge’s goal is to impose a sentence that is fair, just, and proportional to the crime committed.
Appeals
After the trial and sentencing, the defendant has the right to appeal the conviction or sentence. An appeal is a legal process in which a higher court reviews the trial court’s proceedings to determine if there were any errors that affected the outcome of the case. Grounds for appeal may include errors in the judge’s instructions to the jury, improper admission or exclusion of evidence, prosecutorial misconduct, or ineffective assistance of counsel.
If the appellate court finds that significant errors occurred, it may overturn the conviction, reduce the sentence, or order a new trial. The appeals process can be lengthy and complex, often requiring experience of an appellate attorney.
Facing Criminal Charges? Fight for Your Tomorrow — Contact Arthur L. Pressman Today
Navigating a criminal trial requires a thorough understanding of the legal process and the ability to effectively advocate for your rights. If you or a loved one is facing criminal charges, having a dedicated and knowledgeable attorney by your side is crucial. Arthur L. Pressman, Attorney at Law, is committed to providing vigorous and compassionate representation to clients throughout their criminal trials.
With extensive experience in New York’s criminal justice system, our firm will work tirelessly to defend your rights and achieve the best possible outcome for your case. Contact Arthur L. Pressman, Attorney at Law, today to schedule a consultation — and take the first step toward securing your future.